← Lynnway Park overview·Financial Model
Revenue Model · Scenario Comparison

Lynnway Park: Revenue Model

What the site can earn by tenant and workload type: one point estimate per scenario, undiscounted and without Monte Carlo, on the same occupancy ramp and timeline as the 626 Lynnway and 0 Circle Avenue pages so the two stay comparable.

Nominal · no discounting T0 = Jan 2027 COD = month 14 85% stabilised occupancy
Landlord view
Location
New Build: Shell-Only (Landlord)
New Build: Full-Turnkey (Landlord-Funded)
Conversion: Floor-Prep (Landlord)
At the 6MW default the site is too small to fill with a diversified retail mix; a single niche GPU tenant is more likely.
Landlord rent $28.37/kW/mo = 11.97% of $237/kW/mo operator blend
Operator view (reference only, not this model's output)
Operator / tenant-facing rates by workload. See Assumptions §1

Capacity & occupancy

Shared across every scenario; only the rate, rack density and cost-driver profile change per scenario.

Compare scenarios on chart
Blend weights (mix into one custom rate)

Monthly revenue by scenario

Landlord Perspective: Lynnway Park's income
Operator Perspective: informational only, not Lynnway Park's income